Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.6

Compare Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct from Ai2 and Claude Opus 4.6 from Anthropic on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.6: side-by-side summary

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct and Claude Opus 4.6 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, from Ai2, has a 65,536-token context window and is priced by the provider serving it on OpenRouter.

Claude Opus 4.6, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $5/M tokens input, $25/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct: 65,536 tokens
  • Claude Opus 4.6: 1,000,000 tokens
Price
  • Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct: Pricing varies by provider
  • Claude Opus 4.6: $5/M tokens input, $25/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct: Ai2
  • Claude Opus 4.6: Anthropic
  • Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct model details, providers and pricing
  • Claude Opus 4.6 model details, providers and pricing