Compare Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking from Qwen and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.




Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, from Qwen, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.29/M tokens input, $1/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct, from Qwen, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.25/M tokens input, $0.75/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking | Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.29/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $1/M tokens | $0.75/M tokens |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 9.5 | 7.3 |
| Coding Index | Not available | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 0.96 s | 0.77 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 53.0 tok/s | 37.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on OpenRouter: Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs $0.25/M tokens input and $0.75/M tokens output, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.29/M tokens input and $1/M tokens output.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct have the same context window of 262,144 tokens.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 53.0 tokens per second compared with 37.0 tokens per second for Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct.