Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs GLM 4.6

Compare Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) from Google and GLM 4.6 from Z.ai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for google
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Favicon for z-ai
GLM 4.6
Favicon for google
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Favicon for z-ai
GLM 4.6

Overview

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Author
Google
GLM 4.6
Author
Z.ai
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Context length
33Ktokens
GLM 4.6
Context length
205Ktokens
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Reasoning
GLM 4.6
Reasoning
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Input modalities
GLM 4.6
Input modalities
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Output modalities
GLM 4.6
Output modalities

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs GLM 4.6: side-by-side summary

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and GLM 4.6 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), from Google, has a 32,768-token context window and is priced at $0.30/M tokens input, $30/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

GLM 4.6, from Z.ai, has a 204,800-token context window and is priced at $0.43/M tokens input, $1.75/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens
  • GLM 4.6: 204,800 tokens
Price
  • Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): $0.30/M tokens input, $30/M tokens output
  • GLM 4.6: $0.43/M tokens input, $1.75/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): Google
  • GLM 4.6: Z.ai
  • model details, providers and pricing
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
model details, providers and pricing
GLM 4.6

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs GLM 4.6 at a glance

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs GLM 4.6 comparison
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)GLM 4.6
Input priceNot applicable$0.43/M tokens
Output priceNot applicable$1.75/M tokens
Context window32,768 tokens204,800 tokens
Intelligence IndexNot available18.5
Coding IndexNot available45.8
Agentic IndexNot availableNot available
Latency (p50)1.01 s0.91 s
Throughput (p50)46.0 tok/s28.0 tok/s

Oct 5, 2026

Which has the longer context window, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or GLM 4.6?

GLM 4.6 has the longer context window at 204,800 tokens, compared with 32,768 tokens for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image).

Which is faster, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or GLM 4.6?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 46.0 tokens per second compared with 28.0 tokens per second for GLM 4.6.

Attribute
Benchmark data updated
Frequently asked questions