Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Qwen3 Embedding 4B vs GLM 4.7

Compare Qwen3 Embedding 4B from Qwen and GLM 4.7 from Z.ai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Qwen3 Embedding 4B vs GLM 4.7: side-by-side summary

Qwen3 Embedding 4B and GLM 4.7 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Qwen3 Embedding 4B, from Qwen, has a 32,768-token context window and is priced at $0.02/M tokens on OpenRouter.

GLM 4.7, from Z.ai, has a 204,800-token context window and is priced at $0.40/M tokens input, $1.75/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Qwen3 Embedding 4B: 32,768 tokens
  • GLM 4.7: 204,800 tokens
Price
  • Qwen3 Embedding 4B: $0.02/M tokens
  • GLM 4.7: $0.40/M tokens input, $1.75/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Qwen3 Embedding 4B: Qwen
  • GLM 4.7: Z.ai
  • Qwen3 Embedding 4B model details, providers and pricing
  • GLM 4.7 model details, providers and pricing