Compare DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 from DeepSeek and Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Claude Opus 4.7 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.1675/M tokens input, $0.4607/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Claude Opus 4.7, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $5/M tokens input, $25/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1675/M tokens | $5/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.4607/M tokens | $25/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 30.1 | 30.9 |
| Coding Index | 58.7 | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 0.66 s | 1.31 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 89.0 tok/s | 48.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 on OpenRouter: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs $0.1675/M tokens input and $0.4607/M tokens output, while Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/M tokens input and $25/M tokens output.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Opus 4.7.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 89.0 tokens per second compared with 48.0 tokens per second for Claude Opus 4.7.