Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Step 3.7 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7

Compare Step 3.7 Flash from stepfun and MiniMax M2.7 from MiniMax on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Step 3.7 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7: side-by-side summary

Step 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.7 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Step 3.7 Flash, from stepfun, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.16/M tokens input, $0.92/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

MiniMax M2.7, from MiniMax, has a 204,800-token context window and is priced at $0.21/M tokens input, $0.84/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Step 3.7 Flash: 262,144 tokens
  • MiniMax M2.7: 204,800 tokens
Price
  • Step 3.7 Flash: $0.16/M tokens input, $0.92/M tokens output
  • MiniMax M2.7: $0.21/M tokens input, $0.84/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Step 3.7 Flash: stepfun
  • MiniMax M2.7: MiniMax
  • Step 3.7 Flash model details, providers and pricing
  • MiniMax M2.7 model details, providers and pricing