Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Compare Claude Fable 5.1 from Anthropic and Ling 3.0 Flash VL from inclusionai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: side-by-side summary

Claude Fable 5.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Claude Fable 5.1, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $10/M tokens input, $50/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL, from inclusionai, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced by the provider serving it on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Claude Fable 5.1: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens
Price
  • Claude Fable 5.1: $10/M tokens input, $50/M tokens output
  • Ling 3.0 Flash VL: Pricing varies by provider
Provided by
  • Claude Fable 5.1: Anthropic
  • Ling 3.0 Flash VL: inclusionai
  • Claude Fable 5.1 model details, providers and pricing
  • Ling 3.0 Flash VL model details, providers and pricing