Compare Claude Fable 5.1 from Anthropic and GPT-6 Astra from OpenAI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Claude Fable 5.1, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $10/M tokens input, $50/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
GPT-6 Astra, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window and is priced at $10/M tokens input, $50/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $10/M tokens | $10/M tokens |
| Output price | $50/M tokens | $50/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 53.4 | 52.7 |
| Coding Index | 81.6 | 76.9 |
| Agentic Index | 57.9 | 51.0 |
| Latency (p50) | 7.12 s | 5.59 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 53.0 tok/s | 35.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
GPT-6 Astra has the longer context window at 1,050,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Fable 5.1.
Claude Fable 5.1 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 53.0 tokens per second compared with 35.0 tokens per second for GPT-6 Astra.
Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 81.6 compared with 76.9 for GPT-6 Astra.