Compare Claude Fable 5 from Anthropic and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 from DeepSeek on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $10/M tokens | $0.0999/M tokens |
| Output price | $50/M tokens | $8/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | 23.1 |
| Coding Index | 76.5 | 68.8 |
| Agentic Index | 50.7 | 41.3 |
| Latency (p50) | 3.74 s | 0.69 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 55.0 tok/s | 15.0 tok/s |
| Provided by | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Model page | Claude Fable 5 model details, providers and pricing | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 model details, providers and pricing |
Benchmark data updated
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on OpenRouter: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.0999/M tokens input and $8/M tokens output, while Claude Fable 5 costs $10/M tokens input and $50/M tokens output.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Fable 5.
Claude Fable 5 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 55.0 tokens per second compared with 15.0 tokens per second for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813.
Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 76.5 compared with 68.8 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813.