Compare Claude Fable 5 from Anthropic and Kimi K3 from moonshotai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Claude Fable 5 and Kimi K3 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Claude Fable 5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $10/M tokens input, $50/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Kimi K3, from moonshotai, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.75/M tokens input, $14.90/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $10/M tokens | $0.75/M tokens |
| Output price | $50/M tokens | $14.90/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 49.6 | 43.6 |
| Coding Index | 76.5 | 76.2 |
| Agentic Index | 50.7 | 50.0 |
| Latency (p50) | Not available | 1.47 s |
| Throughput (p50) | Not available | 20.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Kimi K3 is cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on OpenRouter: Kimi K3 costs $0.75/M tokens input and $14.90/M tokens output, while Claude Fable 5 costs $10/M tokens input and $50/M tokens output.
Kimi K3 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Fable 5.
Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 76.5 compared with 76.2 for Kimi K3.