Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Compare Claude Fable 5 from Anthropic and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: side-by-side summary

Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Claude Fable 5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $10/M tokens input, $50/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, from Qwen, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $2/M tokens input, $6/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window

Claude Fable 5: 1,000,000 tokens
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens

Price

Claude Fable 5: $10/M tokens input, $50/M tokens output
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: $2/M tokens input, $6/M tokens output

Provided by

Claude Fable 5: Anthropic
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Qwen

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at a glance

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B comparison
Attribute	Claude Fable 5	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price	$10/M tokens	$2/M tokens
Output price	$50/M tokens	$6/M tokens
Context window	1,000,000 tokens	1,048,576 tokens
Intelligence Index	Not available	Not available
Coding Index	76.5	71.9
Agentic Index	50.7	50.1
Latency (p50)	2.13 s	6.17 s
Throughput (p50)	51.5 tok/s	36.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 28, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on OpenRouter: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2/M tokens input and $6/M tokens output, while Claude Fable 5 costs $10/M tokens input and $50/M tokens output.

Which has the longer context window, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Fable 5.

Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Claude Fable 5 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 51.5 tokens per second compared with 36.0 tokens per second for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.

Which scores higher on coding, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 76.5 compared with 71.9 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Overview