Compare Claude Opus 4.5 from Anthropic and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Claude Opus 4.5, from Anthropic, has a 200,000-token context window and is priced at $5/M tokens input, $25/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, from Qwen, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.15/M tokens input, $1.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Claude Opus 4.5 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $25/M tokens | $1.20/M tokens |
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 29.1 | 11.2 |
| Coding Index | Not available | 17.4 |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 2.40 s | 0.35 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 41.0 tok/s | 114.0 tok/s |
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 on OpenRouter: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M tokens input and $1.20/M tokens output, while Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5/M tokens input and $25/M tokens output.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 200,000 tokens for Claude Opus 4.5.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 114.0 tokens per second compared with 41.0 tokens per second for Claude Opus 4.5.