Compare Claude Opus 5.5 from Anthropic and Ember-1 from Fireworks AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
Claude Opus 5.5 and Ember-1 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Claude Opus 5.5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $4/M tokens input, $20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Ember-1, from Fireworks AI, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $3/M tokens input, $15/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Claude Opus 5.5 | Ember-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $4/M tokens | $3/M tokens |
| Output price | $20/M tokens | $15/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 57.6 | Not available |
| Coding Index | Not available | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 3.99 s | 0.96 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 92.0 tok/s | 53.5 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Ember-1 is cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on OpenRouter: Ember-1 costs $3/M tokens input and $15/M tokens output, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/M tokens input and $20/M tokens output.
Ember-1 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Opus 5.5.
Claude Opus 5.5 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 92.0 tokens per second compared with 53.5 tokens per second for Ember-1.