Compare Claude Opus 5.5 from Anthropic and Kimi K3.1 Pro from moonshotai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Claude Opus 5.5 and Kimi K3.1 Pro are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Claude Opus 5.5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $4/M tokens input, $20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Kimi K3.1 Pro, from moonshotai, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $2/M tokens input, $10/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Claude Opus 5.5 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $4/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Output price | $20/M tokens | $10/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 58.4 | 46.0 |
| Coding Index | Not available | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 4.10 s | 5.61 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 76.0 tok/s | 25.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Kimi K3.1 Pro is cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on OpenRouter: Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2/M tokens input and $10/M tokens output, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/M tokens input and $20/M tokens output.
Kimi K3.1 Pro has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Opus 5.5.
Claude Opus 5.5 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 76.0 tokens per second compared with 25.0 tokens per second for Kimi K3.1 Pro.