Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Ministral 3 3B 2512
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 from Anthropic and Ministral 3 3B 2512 from Mistral on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
Overview
Analysis
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Ministral 3 3B 2512 at a glance
| Attribute | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Ministral 3 3B 2512 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $0.10/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $0.10/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | Not available |
| Coding Index | 63.0 | 4.8 |
| Agentic Index | 31.8 | 0.8 |
| Latency (p50) | 0.61 s | 0.34 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 42.0 tok/s | 170.5 tok/s |
| Provided by | Anthropic | Mistral |
| Model page | Claude Sonnet 4.6 model details, providers and pricing | Ministral 3 3B 2512 model details, providers and pricing |
Benchmark data updated
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 cheaper than Ministral 3 3B 2512?
Ministral 3 3B 2512 is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on OpenRouter: Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs $0.10/M tokens input and $0.10/M tokens output, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/M tokens input and $15/M tokens output.
Which has the longer context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Ministral 3 3B 2512?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the longer context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 131,072 tokens for Ministral 3 3B 2512.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Ministral 3 3B 2512?
Ministral 3 3B 2512 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 170.5 tokens per second compared with 42.0 tokens per second for Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Which scores higher on coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Ministral 3 3B 2512?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 63.0 compared with 4.8 for Ministral 3 3B 2512.