Compare ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking from baidu and MiMo-V2-Flash from Xiaomi on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking and MiMo-V2-Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking, from baidu, has a 131,072-token context window and is priced by the provider serving it on OpenRouter.
MiMo-V2-Flash, from Xiaomi, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced by the provider serving it on OpenRouter.
| ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Pricing varies by provider | Pricing varies by provider |
| Output price | Pricing varies by provider | Pricing varies by provider |
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | 22.4 |
| Coding Index | Not available | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | Not available | Not available |
| Throughput (p50) | Not available | Not available |
MiMo-V2-Flash has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 131,072 tokens for ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking.