Seed 1.6 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare Seed 1.6 Flash from bytedance-seed and GLM 4.7 Flash from Z.ai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Seed 1.6 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash: side-by-side summary

Seed 1.6 Flash and GLM 4.7 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Seed 1.6 Flash, from bytedance-seed, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.075/M tokens input, $0.30/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

GLM 4.7 Flash, from Z.ai, has a 200,000-token context window and is priced at $0.06/M tokens input, $0.40/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window

Seed 1.6 Flash: 262,144 tokens
GLM 4.7 Flash: 200,000 tokens

Price

Seed 1.6 Flash: $0.075/M tokens input, $0.30/M tokens output
GLM 4.7 Flash: $0.06/M tokens input, $0.40/M tokens output

Provided by

Seed 1.6 Flash: bytedance-seed
GLM 4.7 Flash: Z.ai

Seed 1.6 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash at a glance

Seed 1.6 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash comparison
Attribute	Seed 1.6 Flash	GLM 4.7 Flash
Input price	$0.075/M tokens	$0.06/M tokens
Output price	$0.30/M tokens	$0.40/M tokens
Context window	262,144 tokens	200,000 tokens
Intelligence Index	Not available	14.9
Coding Index	Not available	Not available
Agentic Index	Not available	Not available
Latency (p50)	0.54 s	0.92 s
Throughput (p50)	87.0 tok/s	54.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 5, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Which has the longer context window, Seed 1.6 Flash or GLM 4.7 Flash?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 200,000 tokens for GLM 4.7 Flash.

Which is faster, Seed 1.6 Flash or GLM 4.7 Flash?

Seed 1.6 Flash is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 87.0 tokens per second compared with 54.0 tokens per second for GLM 4.7 Flash.

Seed 1.6 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Overview