Compare UI-TARS 7B from bytedance and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
UI-TARS 7B and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
UI-TARS 7B , from bytedance, has a 128,000-token context window and is priced at $0.10/M tokens input, $0.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.25/M tokens input, $1.50/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | UI-TARS 7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.10/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.20/M tokens | $1.50/M tokens |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | Not available |
| Coding Index | Not available | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 0.79 s | 0.80 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 49.5 tok/s | 119.0 tok/s |
UI-TARS 7B is cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite on OpenRouter: UI-TARS 7B costs $0.10/M tokens input and $0.20/M tokens output, while Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25/M tokens input and $1.50/M tokens output.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 128,000 tokens for UI-TARS 7B .
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 119.0 tokens per second compared with 49.5 tokens per second for UI-TARS 7B .