Compare Command R7B (12-2024) from Cohere and MiMo-V2.5 from Xiaomi on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Command R7B (12-2024) and MiMo-V2.5 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Command R7B (12-2024), from Cohere, has a 128,000-token context window and is priced at $0.0375/M tokens input, $0.15/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
MiMo-V2.5, from Xiaomi, has a 1,050,000-token context window and is priced at $0.119/M tokens input, $0.238/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Command R7B (12-2024) | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.0375/M tokens | $0.119/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.15/M tokens | $0.238/M tokens |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | 21.8 |
| Coding Index | Not available | 56.8 |
| Agentic Index | Not available | 15.8 |
| Latency (p50) | 0.24 s | 4.09 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 60.0 tok/s | 28.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Command R7B (12-2024) is cheaper than MiMo-V2.5 on OpenRouter: Command R7B (12-2024) costs $0.0375/M tokens input and $0.15/M tokens output, while MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.119/M tokens input and $0.238/M tokens output.
MiMo-V2.5 has the longer context window at 1,050,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 tokens for Command R7B (12-2024).
Command R7B (12-2024) is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 60.0 tokens per second compared with 28.0 tokens per second for MiMo-V2.5.