Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp from DeepSeek and Gemini 3.7 Flash from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.7 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.2156/M tokens input, $0.6468/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Gemini 3.7 Flash, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.75/M tokens input, $3.75/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.2156/M tokens | $0.75/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.6468/M tokens | $3.75/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 34.8 | 39.6 |
| Coding Index | 65.0 | 71.5 |
| Agentic Index | 47.5 | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 1.13 s | 1.75 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 123.0 tok/s | 66.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash on OpenRouter: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.2156/M tokens input and $0.6468/M tokens output, while Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75/M tokens input and $3.75/M tokens output.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.7 Flash have the same context window of 1,048,576 tokens.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 123.0 tokens per second compared with 66.0 tokens per second for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 71.5 compared with 65.0 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp.