Skip to content
Alpha
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori

Footer

OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Ori
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • EU routing
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Compare DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 from DeepSeek and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety from Nvidia on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for deepseek
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Favicon for nvidia
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Favicon for deepseek
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Favicon for nvidia
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Overview

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Author
DeepSeek
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Author
Nvidia
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Context length
1.05Mtokens
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Context length
131Ktokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Reasoning
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Reasoning
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Input modalities
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input modalities
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Output modalities
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Output modalities

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: side-by-side summary

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.2262/M tokens input, $0.4524/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety, from Nvidia, has a 131,072-token context window and is priced at $0.20/M tokens input, $0.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423: 1,048,576 tokens
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens
Price
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423: $0.2262/M tokens input, $0.4524/M tokens output
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: $0.20/M tokens input, $0.20/M tokens output
Provided by
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423: DeepSeek
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: Nvidia
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 model details, providers and pricing
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety model details, providers and pricing

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety at a glance

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety comparison
AttributeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price$0.2262/M tokens$0.20/M tokens
Output price$0.4524/M tokens$0.20/M tokens
Context window1,048,576 tokens131,072 tokens
Intelligence Index30.1Not available
Coding Index58.7Not available
Agentic IndexNot availableNot available
Latency (p50)2.05 s0.33 s
Throughput (p50)37.0 tok/s207.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 24, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 on OpenRouter: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0.20/M tokens input and $0.20/M tokens output, while DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs $0.2262/M tokens input and $0.4524/M tokens output.

Which has the longer context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 131,072 tokens for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety.

Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 207.0 tokens per second compared with 37.0 tokens per second for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423.