Skip to content
Alpha
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori

Footer

OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Ori
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • EU routing
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1

Compare DeepSeek V4.1 Flash from DeepSeek and Nano Banana 2.1 from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for deepseek
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Favicon for google
Nano Banana 2.1
Favicon for deepseek
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Favicon for google
Nano Banana 2.1

Overview

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Author
DeepSeek
Nano Banana 2.1
Author
Google
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Context length
1.05Mtokens
Nano Banana 2.1
Context length
66Ktokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Reasoning
Nano Banana 2.1
Reasoning
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input modalities
Nano Banana 2.1
Input modalities
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Output modalities
Nano Banana 2.1
Output modalities

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1: side-by-side summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Nano Banana 2.1 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.02/M tokens input, $1/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Nano Banana 2.1, from Google, has a 65,536-token context window and is priced at $1.50/M tokens input, $30/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens
  • Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens
Price
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.02/M tokens input, $1/M tokens output
  • Nano Banana 2.1: $1.50/M tokens input, $30/M tokens output
Provided by
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: DeepSeek
  • Nano Banana 2.1: Google
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash model details, providers and pricing
  • Nano Banana 2.1 model details, providers and pricing

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1 at a glance

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1 comparison
AttributeDeepSeek V4.1 FlashNano Banana 2.1
Input price$0.02/M tokensNot applicable
Output price$1/M tokensNot applicable
Context window1,048,576 tokens65,536 tokens
Intelligence Index24.7Not available
Coding IndexNot availableNot available
Agentic IndexNot availableNot available
Latency (p50)0.83 s0.73 s
Throughput (p50)86.0 tok/s53.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 24, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Which has the longer context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Nano Banana 2.1?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 65,536 tokens for Nano Banana 2.1.

Which is faster, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Nano Banana 2.1?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 86.0 tokens per second compared with 53.0 tokens per second for Nano Banana 2.1.