Skip to content
Alpha
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori

Footer

OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Ori
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • EU routing
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs MiniMax M2

Compare Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) from Google and MiniMax M2 from MiniMax on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for google
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Favicon for minimax
MiniMax M2
Favicon for google
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Favicon for minimax
MiniMax M2

Overview

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Author
Google
MiniMax M2
Author
MiniMax
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Context length
33Ktokens
MiniMax M2
Context length
205Ktokens
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Reasoning
MiniMax M2
Reasoning
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Input modalities
MiniMax M2
Input modalities
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Output modalities
MiniMax M2
Output modalities

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs MiniMax M2: side-by-side summary

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and MiniMax M2 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), from Google, has a 32,768-token context window and is priced at $0.30/M tokens input, $30/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

MiniMax M2, from MiniMax, has a 204,800-token context window and is priced at $0.255/M tokens input, $1.02/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens
  • MiniMax M2: 204,800 tokens
Price
  • Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): $0.30/M tokens input, $30/M tokens output
  • MiniMax M2: $0.255/M tokens input, $1.02/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): Google
  • MiniMax M2: MiniMax
  • Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) model details, providers and pricing
  • MiniMax M2 model details, providers and pricing

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs MiniMax M2 at a glance

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs MiniMax M2 comparison
AttributeNano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)MiniMax M2
Input priceNot applicable$0.255/M tokens
Output priceNot applicable$1.02/M tokens
Context window32,768 tokens204,800 tokens
Intelligence IndexNot available18.6
Coding IndexNot availableNot available
Agentic IndexNot availableNot available
Latency (p50)1.10 s0.95 s
Throughput (p50)54.0 tok/s50.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 5, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Which has the longer context window, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or MiniMax M2?

MiniMax M2 has the longer context window at 204,800 tokens, compared with 32,768 tokens for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image).

Which is faster, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or MiniMax M2?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 54.0 tokens per second compared with 50.0 tokens per second for MiniMax M2.