Compare Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) from Google and MiniMax M2 from MiniMax on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and MiniMax M2 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), from Google, has a 32,768-token context window and is priced at $0.30/M tokens input, $30/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
MiniMax M2, from MiniMax, has a 204,800-token context window and is priced at $0.255/M tokens input, $1.02/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | MiniMax M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Not applicable | $0.255/M tokens |
| Output price | Not applicable | $1.02/M tokens |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | 18.6 |
| Coding Index | Not available | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 0.90 s | 0.68 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 51.0 tok/s | 76.0 tok/s |
MiniMax M2 has the longer context window at 204,800 tokens, compared with 32,768 tokens for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image).
MiniMax M2 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 76.0 tokens per second compared with 51.0 tokens per second for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image).