Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro from Google and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: side-by-side summary

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Gemini 2.5 Pro, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $1.25/M tokens input, $10/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking, from Qwen, has a 131,072-token context window and is priced by the provider serving it on OpenRouter.

Context window

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens

Price

Gemini 2.5 Pro: $1.25/M tokens input, $10/M tokens output
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: Pricing varies by provider

Provided by

Gemini 2.5 Pro: Google
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: Qwen

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at a glance

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking comparison
Attribute	Gemini 2.5 Pro	Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input price	$1.25/M tokens	Pricing varies by provider
Output price	$10/M tokens	Pricing varies by provider
Context window	1,048,576 tokens	131,072 tokens
Intelligence Index	14.5	13.4
Coding Index	Not available	Not available
Agentic Index	Not available	Not available
Latency (p50)	3.28 s	Not available
Throughput (p50)	97.0 tok/s	Not available

Benchmark data updated Oct 5, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Which has the longer context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Gemini 2.5 Pro has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 131,072 tokens for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Overview