Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) from Google and Muse Spark 1.1 from Meta on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Muse Spark 1.1: side-by-side summary

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Muse Spark 1.1 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), from Google, has a 131,072-token context window and is priced at $0.50/M tokens input, $60/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Muse Spark 1.1, from Meta, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $1.25/M tokens input, $4.25/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 131,072 tokens
  • Muse Spark 1.1: 1,048,576 tokens
Price
  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): $0.50/M tokens input, $60/M tokens output
  • Muse Spark 1.1: $1.25/M tokens input, $4.25/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): Google
  • Muse Spark 1.1: Meta
  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) model details, providers and pricing
  • Muse Spark 1.1 model details, providers and pricing