Compare Gemini 3.8 Flash from Google and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Gemini 3.8 Flash, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.75/M tokens input, $3.75/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Qwen3.8 Max (0902), from Qwen, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $2/M tokens input, $6/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.75/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Output price | $3.75/M tokens | $6/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 40.9 | 45.4 |
| Coding Index | 76.3 | 76.2 |
| Agentic Index | 40.2 | 56.0 |
| Latency (p50) | 2.10 s | 4.37 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 176.0 tok/s | 32.0 tok/s |
Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on OpenRouter: Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/M tokens input and $3.75/M tokens output, while Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2/M tokens input and $6/M tokens output.
Gemini 3.8 Flash has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Qwen3.8 Max (0902).
Gemini 3.8 Flash is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 176.0 tokens per second compared with 32.0 tokens per second for Qwen3.8 Max (0902).
Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 76.3 compared with 76.2 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902).