Compare Gemini 4 Argon from Google and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL from Nvidia on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
Gemini 4 Argon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Gemini 4 Argon, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $2/M tokens input, $10/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, from Nvidia, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.10/M tokens input, $0.40/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Gemini 4 Argon | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | $0.10/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $0.40/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 52.6 | 26.5 |
| Coding Index | Not available | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 4.54 s | 0.19 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 39.0 tok/s | 169.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on OpenRouter: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.10/M tokens input and $0.40/M tokens output, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/M tokens input and $10/M tokens output.
Gemini 4 Argon and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL have the same context window of 1,048,576 tokens.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 169.0 tokens per second compared with 39.0 tokens per second for Gemini 4 Argon.