Compare Nano Banana 2.1 from Google and Mistral Medium 3.5 from Mistral on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
| Attribute | Nano Banana 2.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Not applicable | $1.50/M tokens |
| Output price | Not applicable | $7.50/M tokens |
| Price | $1.50/M tokens input, $30/M tokens output | $1.50/M tokens input, $7.50/M tokens output |
| Context window | 65,536 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | 4.6 |
| Coding Index | Not available | 46.9 |
| Agentic Index | Not available | 7.0 |
| Latency (p50) | 0.76 s | 0.56 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 57.0 tok/s | 95.0 tok/s |
| Provided by | Mistral | |
| Model page | Nano Banana 2.1 model details, providers and pricing | Mistral Medium 3.5 model details, providers and pricing |
Benchmark data updated
Mistral Medium 3.5 has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 65,536 tokens for Nano Banana 2.1.
Mistral Medium 3.5 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 95.0 tokens per second compared with 57.0 tokens per second for Nano Banana 2.1.