Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B from Google and Qwen3.6 35B A3B from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Gemma 4 26B A4B , from Google, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.042/M tokens input, $0.22/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B, from Qwen, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.05/M tokens input, $0.70/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.042/M tokens | $0.05/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.22/M tokens | $0.70/M tokens |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 13.1 | 18.2 |
| Coding Index | Not available | 41.9 |
| Agentic Index | Not available | 13.1 |
| Latency (p50) | 1.27 s | 1.70 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 36.0 tok/s | 76.0 tok/s |
Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on OpenRouter: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.042/M tokens input and $0.22/M tokens output, while Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.05/M tokens input and $0.70/M tokens output.
Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B have the same context window of 262,144 tokens.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 76.0 tokens per second compared with 36.0 tokens per second for Gemma 4 26B A4B .