Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Mercury 2.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Compare Mercury 2.5 from inception and Ling 3.0 Flash VL from inclusionai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Mercury 2.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: side-by-side summary

Mercury 2.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Mercury 2.5, from inception, has a 260,000-token context window and is priced at $0.04/M tokens input, $0.15/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL, from inclusionai, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced by the provider serving it on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Mercury 2.5: 260,000 tokens
  • Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens
Price
  • Mercury 2.5: $0.04/M tokens input, $0.15/M tokens output
  • Ling 3.0 Flash VL: Pricing varies by provider
Provided by
  • Mercury 2.5: inception
  • Ling 3.0 Flash VL: inclusionai
  • Mercury 2.5 model details, providers and pricing
  • Ling 3.0 Flash VL model details, providers and pricing