Compare Ling 3.0 Flash from inclusionai and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
| Attribute | Ling 3.0 Flash | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.021/M tokens | $0.30/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.063/M tokens | $2.50/M tokens |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | 11.7 |
| Coding Index | 50.6 | 49.3 |
| Agentic Index | 19.3 | 14.3 |
| Latency (p50) | 0.71 s | 0.77 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 141.0 tok/s | 145.0 tok/s |
| Provided by | inclusionai | |
| Model page | Ling 3.0 Flash model details, providers and pricing | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite model details, providers and pricing |
Benchmark data updated
Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on OpenRouter: Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.021/M tokens input and $0.063/M tokens output, while Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30/M tokens input and $2.50/M tokens output.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 262,144 tokens for Ling 3.0 Flash.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 145.0 tokens per second compared with 141.0 tokens per second for Ling 3.0 Flash.
Ling 3.0 Flash scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 50.6 compared with 49.3 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.