Skip to content
Alpha
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
ElevenLabs launch offer: every ElevenLabs model is 50% off through October 19, 2026. See ElevenLabs models

Footer

OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Ori
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • EU routing
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Compare Ling 3.0 Flash from inclusionai and GLM 5.3 Flash from Z.ai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for inclusionai
Ling 3.0 Flash
Favicon for z-ai
GLM 5.3 Flash
Favicon for inclusionai
Ling 3.0 Flash
Favicon for z-ai
GLM 5.3 Flash

Overview

Ling 3.0 Flash
Author
inclusionai
GLM 5.3 Flash
Author
Z.ai
Ling 3.0 Flash
Context length
262Ktokens
GLM 5.3 Flash
Context length
1.05Mtokens
Ling 3.0 Flash
Reasoning
GLM 5.3 Flash
Reasoning
Ling 3.0 Flash
Input modalities
GLM 5.3 Flash
Input modalities
Ling 3.0 Flash
Output modalities
GLM 5.3 Flash
Output modalities

Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash: side-by-side summary

Ling 3.0 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Ling 3.0 Flash, from inclusionai, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.021/M tokens input, $0.063/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

GLM 5.3 Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.048/M tokens input, $0.16/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens
  • GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens
Price
  • Ling 3.0 Flash: $0.021/M tokens input, $0.063/M tokens output
  • GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.048/M tokens input, $0.16/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Ling 3.0 Flash: inclusionai
  • GLM 5.3 Flash: Z.ai
  • Ling 3.0 Flash model details, providers and pricing
  • GLM 5.3 Flash model details, providers and pricing

Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash at a glance

Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash comparison
AttributeLing 3.0 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash
Input price$0.021/M tokens$0.048/M tokens
Output price$0.063/M tokens$0.16/M tokens
Context window262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Intelligence Index20.141.8
Coding Index50.671.5
Agentic Index19.350.9
Latency (p50)0.78 s1.25 s
Throughput (p50)139.0 tok/s64.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 9, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Is Ling 3.0 Flash cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on OpenRouter: Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.021/M tokens input and $0.063/M tokens output, while GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.048/M tokens input and $0.16/M tokens output.

Which has the longer context window, Ling 3.0 Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 262,144 tokens for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Which is faster, Ling 3.0 Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 139.0 tokens per second compared with 64.0 tokens per second for GLM 5.3 Flash.

Which scores higher on coding, Ling 3.0 Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 71.5 compared with 50.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash.