Skip to content
Alpha
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
ElevenLabs launch offer: every ElevenLabs model is 50% off through October 19, 2026. See ElevenLabs models

Footer

OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Ori
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Llama 4 Maverick vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare Llama 4 Maverick from Meta Llama and Step 3.7 Flash from stepfun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for meta-llama
Llama 4 Maverick
Favicon for stepfun
Step 3.7 Flash
Favicon for meta-llama
Llama 4 Maverick
Favicon for stepfun
Step 3.7 Flash

Overview

Llama 4 Maverick
Author
Meta Llama
Step 3.7 Flash
Author
stepfun
Llama 4 Maverick
Context length
1.05Mtokens
Step 3.7 Flash
Context length
262Ktokens
Llama 4 Maverick
Reasoning
Step 3.7 Flash
Reasoning
Llama 4 Maverick
Input modalities
Step 3.7 Flash
Input modalities
Llama 4 Maverick
Output modalities
Step 3.7 Flash
Output modalities

Llama 4 Maverick vs Step 3.7 Flash: side-by-side summary

Llama 4 Maverick and Step 3.7 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Llama 4 Maverick, from Meta Llama, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.1875/M tokens input, $0.6525/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Step 3.7 Flash, from stepfun, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.20/M tokens input, $1.15/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Llama 4 Maverick: 1,048,576 tokens
  • Step 3.7 Flash: 262,144 tokens
Price
  • Llama 4 Maverick: $0.1875/M tokens input, $0.6525/M tokens output
  • Step 3.7 Flash: $0.20/M tokens input, $1.15/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Llama 4 Maverick: Meta Llama
  • Step 3.7 Flash: stepfun
  • Llama 4 Maverick model details, providers and pricing
  • Step 3.7 Flash model details, providers and pricing

Llama 4 Maverick vs Step 3.7 Flash at a glance

Llama 4 Maverick vs Step 3.7 Flash comparison
AttributeLlama 4 MaverickStep 3.7 Flash
Input price$0.1875/M tokens$0.20/M tokens
Output price$0.6525/M tokens$1.15/M tokens
Context window1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
Intelligence Index9.319.5
Coding Index16.339.6
Agentic Index0.6Not available
Latency (p50)0.61 s6.03 s
Throughput (p50)16.0 tok/s37.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 13, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on OpenRouter: Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.1875/M tokens input and $0.6525/M tokens output, while Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20/M tokens input and $1.15/M tokens output.

Which has the longer context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Step 3.7 Flash?

Llama 4 Maverick has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 262,144 tokens for Step 3.7 Flash.

Which is faster, Llama 4 Maverick or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 37.0 tokens per second compared with 16.0 tokens per second for Llama 4 Maverick.

Which scores higher on coding, Llama 4 Maverick or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 39.6 compared with 16.3 for Llama 4 Maverick.