Compare Llama 4 Maverick from Meta Llama and Step 3.7 Flash from stepfun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Llama 4 Maverick and Step 3.7 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Llama 4 Maverick, from Meta Llama, has a 524,288-token context window and is priced at $0.1875/M tokens input, $0.6525/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Step 3.7 Flash, from stepfun, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.20/M tokens input, $1.15/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Llama 4 Maverick | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1875/M tokens | $0.20/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.6525/M tokens | $1.15/M tokens |
| Context window | 524,288 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 9.3 | 19.5 |
| Coding Index | 16.3 | 39.6 |
| Agentic Index | 0.6 | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 0.51 s | 4.18 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 23.0 tok/s | 47.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on OpenRouter: Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.1875/M tokens input and $0.6525/M tokens output, while Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20/M tokens input and $1.15/M tokens output.
Llama 4 Maverick has the longer context window at 524,288 tokens, compared with 262,144 tokens for Step 3.7 Flash.
Step 3.7 Flash is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 47.0 tokens per second compared with 23.0 tokens per second for Llama 4 Maverick.
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 39.6 compared with 16.3 for Llama 4 Maverick.