Compare Llama Guard 4 12B from Meta Llama and MiniMax M3 from MiniMax on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Llama Guard 4 12B and MiniMax M3 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Llama Guard 4 12B, from Meta Llama, has a 163,840-token context window and is priced at $0.18/M tokens input, $0.18/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
MiniMax M3, from MiniMax, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.23/M tokens input, $0.96/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Llama Guard 4 12B | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.18/M tokens | $0.23/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.18/M tokens | $0.96/M tokens |
| Context window | 163,840 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | 29.2 |
| Coding Index | Not available | 58.6 |
| Agentic Index | Not available | 29.5 |
| Latency (p50) | 0.32 s | 0.79 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 39.0 tok/s | 88.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper than MiniMax M3 on OpenRouter: Llama Guard 4 12B costs $0.18/M tokens input and $0.18/M tokens output, while MiniMax M3 costs $0.23/M tokens input and $0.96/M tokens output.
MiniMax M3 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 163,840 tokens for Llama Guard 4 12B.
MiniMax M3 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 88.0 tokens per second compared with 39.0 tokens per second for Llama Guard 4 12B.