Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Compare Llama Guard 4 12B from Meta Llama and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety from Nvidia on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: side-by-side summary

Llama Guard 4 12B and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Llama Guard 4 12B, from Meta Llama, has a 163,840-token context window and is priced at $0.18/M tokens input, $0.18/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety, from Nvidia, has a 131,072-token context window and is priced at $0.20/M tokens input, $0.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens
Price
  • Llama Guard 4 12B: $0.18/M tokens input, $0.18/M tokens output
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: $0.20/M tokens input, $0.20/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Llama Guard 4 12B: Meta Llama
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: Nvidia
  • Llama Guard 4 12B model details, providers and pricing
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety model details, providers and pricing