Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Phi 4 vs Kimi K2.6

Compare Phi 4 from Microsoft and Kimi K2.6 from moonshotai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Phi 4 vs Kimi K2.6: side-by-side summary

Phi 4 and Kimi K2.6 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Phi 4, from Microsoft, has a 16,384-token context window and is priced at $0.07/M tokens input, $0.14/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Kimi K2.6, from moonshotai, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.4972/M tokens input, $2.97/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Phi 4: 16,384 tokens
  • Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens
Price
  • Phi 4: $0.07/M tokens input, $0.14/M tokens output
  • Kimi K2.6: $0.4972/M tokens input, $2.97/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Phi 4: Microsoft
  • Kimi K2.6: moonshotai
Favicon for microsoft
Phi 4
Favicon for moonshotai
Kimi K2.6
Favicon for microsoft
Phi 4
Favicon for moonshotai
Kimi K2.6

Overview

Phi 4
Author
Microsoft
Kimi K2.6
Author
moonshotai
Phi 4
Context length
16Ktokens
Kimi K2.6
Context length
262Ktokens
Phi 4
Reasoning
Kimi K2.6
Reasoning
Phi 4
Input modalities
Kimi K2.6
Input modalities
Phi 4
Output modalities
Kimi K2.6
Output modalities
model details, providers and pricing
model details, providers and pricing
Phi 4
Kimi K2.6