Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Phi 4 vs GLM 5.1

Compare Phi 4 from Microsoft and GLM 5.1 from Z.ai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Phi 4 vs GLM 5.1: side-by-side summary

Phi 4 and GLM 5.1 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Phi 4, from Microsoft, has a 16,384-token context window and is priced at $0.07/M tokens input, $0.14/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

GLM 5.1, from Z.ai, has a 204,800-token context window and is priced at $0.966/M tokens input, $3.036/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Phi 4: 16,384 tokens
  • GLM 5.1: 204,800 tokens
Price
  • Phi 4: $0.07/M tokens input, $0.14/M tokens output
  • GLM 5.1: $0.966/M tokens input, $3.036/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Phi 4: Microsoft
  • GLM 5.1: Z.ai
Favicon for microsoft
Phi 4
Favicon for z-ai
GLM 5.1
Favicon for microsoft
Phi 4
Favicon for z-ai
GLM 5.1

Overview

Phi 4
Author
Microsoft
GLM 5.1
Author
Z.ai
Phi 4
Context length
16Ktokens
GLM 5.1
Context length
205Ktokens
Phi 4
Reasoning
GLM 5.1
Reasoning
Phi 4
Input modalities
GLM 5.1
Input modalities
Phi 4
Output modalities
GLM 5.1
Output modalities
model details, providers and pricing
model details, providers and pricing
Phi 4
GLM 5.1