Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Compare MiniMax M1 from MiniMax and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: side-by-side summary

MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

MiniMax M1, from MiniMax, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $0.40/M tokens input, $2.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507, from Qwen, has a 81,920-token context window and is priced at $0.20/M tokens input, $2.40/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • MiniMax M1: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens
Price
  • MiniMax M1: $0.40/M tokens input, $2.20/M tokens output
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: $0.20/M tokens input, $2.40/M tokens output
Provided by
  • MiniMax M1: MiniMax
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Qwen
  • MiniMax M1 model details, providers and pricing
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 model details, providers and pricing