Compare MiniMax M2.7 from MiniMax and Nemotron 3 Ultra from Nvidia on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
MiniMax M2.7 and Nemotron 3 Ultra are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
MiniMax M2.7, from MiniMax, has a 204,800-token context window and is priced at $0.21/M tokens input, $0.84/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Nemotron 3 Ultra, from Nvidia, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.50/M tokens input, $2.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | MiniMax M2.7 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.21/M tokens | $0.50/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.84/M tokens | $2.20/M tokens |
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 22.8 | 22.9 |
| Coding Index | 52.6 | 49.3 |
| Agentic Index | 15.3 | 20.1 |
| Latency (p50) | 1.56 s | 1.88 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 48.0 tok/s | 47.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper than Nemotron 3 Ultra on OpenRouter: MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.21/M tokens input and $0.84/M tokens output, while Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.50/M tokens input and $2.20/M tokens output.
Nemotron 3 Ultra has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 204,800 tokens for MiniMax M2.7.
MiniMax M2.7 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 48.0 tokens per second compared with 47.0 tokens per second for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 52.6 compared with 49.3 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.