Compare MiniMax M2.7 from MiniMax and Nemotron 3 Ultra from Nvidia on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
MiniMax M2.7 and Nemotron 3 Ultra are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
MiniMax M2.7, from MiniMax, has a 204,800-token context window and is priced at $0.21/M tokens input, $0.84/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Nemotron 3 Ultra, from Nvidia, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.50/M tokens input, $2.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | MiniMax M2.7 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.21/M tokens | $0.50/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.84/M tokens | $2.20/M tokens |
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 22.8 | 22.9 |
| Coding Index | 52.6 | 49.3 |
| Agentic Index | 15.3 | 20.1 |
| Latency (p50) | 1.11 s | 1.12 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 46.0 tok/s | 75.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper than Nemotron 3 Ultra on OpenRouter: MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.21/M tokens input and $0.84/M tokens output, while Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.50/M tokens input and $2.20/M tokens output.
Nemotron 3 Ultra has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 204,800 tokens for MiniMax M2.7.
Nemotron 3 Ultra is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 75.0 tokens per second compared with 46.0 tokens per second for MiniMax M2.7.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 52.6 compared with 49.3 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.