Compare MiniMax M2.7 from MiniMax and Qwen3 Coder Next from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 Coder Next are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
MiniMax M2.7, from MiniMax, has a 204,800-token context window and is priced at $0.21/M tokens input, $0.84/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Qwen3 Coder Next, from Qwen, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.12/M tokens input, $0.80/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.21/M tokens | $0.12/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.84/M tokens | $0.80/M tokens |
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 22.8 | 9.2 |
| Coding Index | 52.6 | 36.2 |
| Agentic Index | 15.3 | 0.9 |
| Latency (p50) | 1.85 s | 1.20 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 42.0 tok/s | 42.0 tok/s |
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on OpenRouter: Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.12/M tokens input and $0.80/M tokens output, while MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.21/M tokens input and $0.84/M tokens output.
Qwen3 Coder Next has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 204,800 tokens for MiniMax M2.7.
MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 Coder Next generate at the same median throughput on OpenRouter: 42.0 tokens per second.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 52.6 compared with 36.2 for Qwen3 Coder Next.