Skip to content
Alpha
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori

Footer

OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Ori
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • EU routing
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Mistral Small 4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Compare Mistral Small 4 from Mistral AI and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety from Nvidia on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for mistralai
Mistral Small 4
Favicon for nvidia
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Favicon for mistralai
Mistral Small 4
Favicon for nvidia
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Overview

Mistral Small 4
Author
Mistral AI
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Author
Nvidia
Mistral Small 4
Context length
262Ktokens
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Context length
131Ktokens
Mistral Small 4
Reasoning
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Reasoning
Mistral Small 4
Input modalities
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input modalities
Mistral Small 4
Output modalities
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Output modalities

Mistral Small 4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: side-by-side summary

Mistral Small 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Mistral Small 4, from Mistral AI, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.15/M tokens input, $0.60/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety, from Nvidia, has a 131,072-token context window and is priced at $0.20/M tokens input, $0.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Mistral Small 4: 262,144 tokens
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens
Price
  • Mistral Small 4: $0.15/M tokens input, $0.60/M tokens output
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: $0.20/M tokens input, $0.20/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Mistral Small 4: Mistral AI
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: Nvidia
  • Mistral Small 4 model details, providers and pricing
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety model details, providers and pricing

Mistral Small 4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety at a glance

Mistral Small 4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety comparison
AttributeMistral Small 4Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price$0.15/M tokens$0.20/M tokens
Output price$0.60/M tokens$0.20/M tokens
Context window262,144 tokens131,072 tokens
Intelligence Index9.0Not available
Coding IndexNot availableNot available
Agentic IndexNot availableNot available
Latency (p50)0.57 s0.37 s
Throughput (p50)100.0 tok/s197.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 5, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 4 cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Mistral Small 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety trade off on price: Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15/M tokens input and $0.60/M tokens output, while Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0.20/M tokens input and $0.20/M tokens output, so Mistral Small 4 is cheaper for input tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is cheaper for output tokens.

Which has the longer context window, Mistral Small 4 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Mistral Small 4 has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 131,072 tokens for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety.

Which is faster, Mistral Small 4 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 197.0 tokens per second compared with 100.0 tokens per second for Mistral Small 4.