Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Kimi Dev 72B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Compare Kimi Dev 72B from moonshotai and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Kimi Dev 72B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: side-by-side summary

Kimi Dev 72B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Kimi Dev 72B, from moonshotai, has a 131,072-token context window and is priced by the provider serving it on OpenRouter.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, from Qwen, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.20/M tokens input, $0.88/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Kimi Dev 72B: 131,072 tokens
  • Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: 262,144 tokens
Price
  • Kimi Dev 72B: Pricing varies by provider
  • Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: $0.20/M tokens input, $0.88/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Kimi Dev 72B: moonshotai
  • Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: Qwen
  • Kimi Dev 72B model details, providers and pricing
  • Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct model details, providers and pricing