Compare Kimi K2.5 from moonshotai and GLM 4.7 Flash from Z.ai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
Kimi K2.5 and GLM 4.7 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Kimi K2.5, from moonshotai, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.45/M tokens input, $2.25/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
GLM 4.7 Flash, from Z.ai, has a 200,000-token context window and is priced at $0.06/M tokens input, $0.40/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Kimi K2.5 | GLM 4.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.45/M tokens | $0.06/M tokens |
| Output price | $2.25/M tokens | $0.40/M tokens |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 200,000 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 19.4 | 14.9 |
| Coding Index | Not available | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 1.61 s | 2.26 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 23.0 tok/s | 15.0 tok/s |
GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on OpenRouter: GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.06/M tokens input and $0.40/M tokens output, while Kimi K2.5 costs $0.45/M tokens input and $2.25/M tokens output.
Kimi K2.5 has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 200,000 tokens for GLM 4.7 Flash.
Kimi K2.5 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 23.0 tokens per second compared with 15.0 tokens per second for GLM 4.7 Flash.