Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Kimi K2.6 vs Phi 4

Compare Kimi K2.6 from moonshotai and Phi 4 from Microsoft on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for moonshotai
Kimi K2.6
Favicon for microsoft
Phi 4
Favicon for moonshotai
Kimi K2.6
Favicon for microsoft
Phi 4

Overview

Kimi K2.6
Author
moonshotai
Phi 4
Author
Microsoft
Kimi K2.6
Context length
262Ktokens
Phi 4
Context length
16Ktokens
Kimi K2.6
Reasoning
Phi 4
Reasoning
Kimi K2.6
Input modalities
Phi 4
Input modalities
Kimi K2.6
Output modalities
Phi 4
Output modalities

Kimi K2.6 vs Phi 4: side-by-side summary

Kimi K2.6 and Phi 4 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Kimi K2.6, from moonshotai, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.4972/M tokens input, $2.97/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Phi 4, from Microsoft, has a 16,384-token context window and is priced at $0.07/M tokens input, $0.14/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens
  • Phi 4: 16,384 tokens
Price
  • Kimi K2.6: $0.4972/M tokens input, $2.97/M tokens output
  • Phi 4: $0.07/M tokens input, $0.14/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Kimi K2.6: moonshotai
  • Phi 4: Microsoft
  • Kimi K2.6 model details, providers and pricing
  • Phi 4 model details, providers and pricing