Compare Kimi K2.7 Code from moonshotai and Inkling from thinkingmachines on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
| Attribute | Kimi K2.7 Code | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.60/M tokens | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | $3/M tokens | $4.05/M tokens |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 524,288 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | 12.5 |
| Coding Index | 60.8 | 52.1 |
| Agentic Index | 21.0 | 22.5 |
| Latency (p50) | 0.71 s | 16.17 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 29.0 tok/s | 13.0 tok/s |
| Provided by | moonshotai | thinkingmachines |
| Model page | Kimi K2.7 Code model details, providers and pricing | Inkling model details, providers and pricing |
Benchmark data updated
Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper than Inkling on OpenRouter: Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.60/M tokens input and $3/M tokens output, while Inkling costs $1/M tokens input and $4.05/M tokens output.
Inkling has the longer context window at 524,288 tokens, compared with 262,144 tokens for Kimi K2.7 Code.
Kimi K2.7 Code is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 29.0 tokens per second compared with 13.0 tokens per second for Inkling.
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 60.8 compared with 52.1 for Inkling.