Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B from Nvidia and Qwen3.6 35B A3B from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, from Nvidia, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.05/M tokens input, $0.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B, from Qwen, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.05/M tokens input, $0.70/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.05/M tokens | $0.05/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.20/M tokens | $0.70/M tokens |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 6.8 | 18.2 |
| Coding Index | Not available | 41.9 |
| Agentic Index | Not available | 13.1 |
| Latency (p50) | 0.51 s | 2.72 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 178.0 tok/s | 57.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on OpenRouter: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.05/M tokens input and $0.20/M tokens output, while Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.05/M tokens input and $0.70/M tokens output.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B have the same context window of 262,144 tokens.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 178.0 tokens per second compared with 57.0 tokens per second for Qwen3.6 35B A3B.