Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Fugu Max

Compare Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety from Nvidia and Fugu Max from sakana on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Fugu Max: side-by-side summary

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Fugu Max are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety, from Nvidia, has a 131,072-token context window and is priced at $0.20/M tokens input, $0.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Fugu Max, from sakana, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $2/M tokens input, $6/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens
  • Fugu Max: 1,000,000 tokens
Price
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: $0.20/M tokens input, $0.20/M tokens output
  • Fugu Max: $2/M tokens input, $6/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: Nvidia
  • Fugu Max: sakana
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety model details, providers and pricing
  • Fugu Max model details, providers and pricing