Compare Nemotron 3.5 Super VL from Nvidia and Pareto 26.9 from Unbiased on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Pareto 26.9 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, from Nvidia, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.10/M tokens input, $0.40/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
Pareto 26.9, from Unbiased, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $2.50/M tokens input, $7.50/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Pareto 26.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.10/M tokens | $2.50/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.40/M tokens | $7.50/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 26.5 | Not available |
| Coding Index | Not available | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 0.18 s | 1.71 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 171.0 tok/s | 51.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on OpenRouter: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.10/M tokens input and $0.40/M tokens output, while Pareto 26.9 costs $2.50/M tokens input and $7.50/M tokens output.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 262,144 tokens for Pareto 26.9.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 171.0 tokens per second compared with 51.0 tokens per second for Pareto 26.9.