Skip to content
Alpha
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori

Footer

OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Ori
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • EU routing
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Pareto 26.9

Compare Nemotron 3.5 Super VL from Nvidia and Pareto 26.9 from Unbiased on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for nvidia
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Favicon for unbiased
Pareto 26.9
Favicon for nvidia
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Favicon for unbiased
Pareto 26.9

Overview

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Author
Nvidia
Pareto 26.9
Author
Unbiased
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Context length
1.05Mtokens
Pareto 26.9
Context length
262Ktokens
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Reasoning
Pareto 26.9
Reasoning
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input modalities
Pareto 26.9
Input modalities
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Output modalities
Pareto 26.9
Output modalities

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Pareto 26.9: side-by-side summary

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Pareto 26.9 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, from Nvidia, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.10/M tokens input, $0.40/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Pareto 26.9, from Unbiased, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $2.50/M tokens input, $7.50/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens
  • Pareto 26.9: 262,144 tokens
Price
  • Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: $0.10/M tokens input, $0.40/M tokens output
  • Pareto 26.9: $2.50/M tokens input, $7.50/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: Nvidia
  • Pareto 26.9: Unbiased
  • Nemotron 3.5 Super VL model details, providers and pricing
  • Pareto 26.9 model details, providers and pricing

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Pareto 26.9 at a glance

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Pareto 26.9 comparison
AttributeNemotron 3.5 Super VLPareto 26.9
Input price$0.10/M tokens$2.50/M tokens
Output price$0.40/M tokens$7.50/M tokens
Context window1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
Intelligence Index26.5Not available
Coding IndexNot availableNot available
Agentic IndexNot availableNot available
Latency (p50)0.18 s1.71 s
Throughput (p50)171.0 tok/s51.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 16, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL cheaper than Pareto 26.9?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on OpenRouter: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.10/M tokens input and $0.40/M tokens output, while Pareto 26.9 costs $2.50/M tokens input and $7.50/M tokens output.

Which has the longer context window, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Pareto 26.9?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 262,144 tokens for Pareto 26.9.

Which is faster, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Pareto 26.9?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 171.0 tokens per second compared with 51.0 tokens per second for Pareto 26.9.