Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna from OpenAI and Qwen3.7 Flash from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Flash: side-by-side summary

GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3.7 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

GPT-5.6 Luna, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window and is priced at $0.20/M tokens input, $1.20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Qwen3.7 Flash, from Qwen, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $0.03/M tokens input, $0.13/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens
  • Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens
Price
  • GPT-5.6 Luna: $0.20/M tokens input, $1.20/M tokens output
  • Qwen3.7 Flash: $0.03/M tokens input, $0.13/M tokens output
Provided by
  • GPT-5.6 Luna: OpenAI
  • Qwen3.7 Flash: Qwen
  • GPT-5.6 Luna model details, providers and pricing
  • Qwen3.7 Flash model details, providers and pricing