Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs Step 3.5 Flash

Compare gpt-oss-safeguard-20b from OpenAI and Step 3.5 Flash from stepfun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs Step 3.5 Flash: side-by-side summary

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and Step 3.5 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b, from OpenAI, has a 131,072-token context window and is priced at $0.075/M tokens input, $0.30/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Step 3.5 Flash, from stepfun, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.10/M tokens input, $0.30/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • gpt-oss-safeguard-20b: 131,072 tokens
  • Step 3.5 Flash: 262,144 tokens
Price
  • gpt-oss-safeguard-20b: $0.075/M tokens input, $0.30/M tokens output
  • Step 3.5 Flash: $0.10/M tokens input, $0.30/M tokens output
Provided by
  • gpt-oss-safeguard-20b: OpenAI
  • Step 3.5 Flash: stepfun
  • gpt-oss-safeguard-20b model details, providers and pricing
  • Step 3.5 Flash model details, providers and pricing